9月GMAT閱讀機(jī)經(jīng):荷馬史詩.

　　9月GMAT機(jī)經(jīng)換庫了，現(xiàn)在就由小編來為大家整理九月份的GMAT閱讀機(jī)經(jīng)整理，下面是關(guān)于GMAT閱讀機(jī)經(jīng)的相關(guān)問題，分享給大家，希望對大家有所幫助，文中觀點(diǎn)僅供參考。

　　本月原始 V1 【捏捏lele】

　　還有一篇大概是關(guān)于oral poetry 和 什么的 實在是忘了

　　V2 【canna 3】

　　關(guān)于原始狗狗主提到的那個oral poetry我也考到了。但是印象中和考古不一樣?？偣矁啥?。第一段就說有個有名的詩人創(chuàng)造了inscription的先河。第二段說以前詩都是靠oral的方法記錄的, 但是由于一些局限性, inscription就應(yīng)允而生了, 自此以后就變得很popular了。

　　相關(guān)文章

　　【V1：2011.09】荷馬史詩在200-600 B.C.的時候被篡改了很多，因為人們在口頭流傳的時候改了很多原來的語言，現(xiàn)代人想編輯出最authentic的edition。普遍方法是通過腳注來解釋篡改的內(nèi)容，但是有一個人說這些不同其實是因為演員在表演這些詩歌的時候加入了自己的即興所以慢慢原本的語言就不在了，而這些演員自己的創(chuàng)造又是很valuable的所以should be paid more attention，而且提出出multi-version的荷馬史詩讓其中包含這個新加入的元素。

　　【V2：2009】荷馬史詩. (P1) 無法確認(rèn)荷馬史詩是writeby荷馬ororal，從16世紀(jì)到20世紀(jì)出現(xiàn)了很多關(guān)于此的text，有很多variation，很多學(xué)者對此很敢興趣，但是卻無法解決。(P2) F提出了一個新觀點(diǎn)，認(rèn)為研究這些variation并不重要，而更加注重講述故事的時間，地點(diǎn)，意義等內(nèi)容。并且用了一種不同與其他學(xué)者的方式，將這些variation describe as footnote(有細(xì)節(jié)題)文章最后一句對F提出疑問，大概是doubt whetherthe variation‘ sinsignificance intersttoF notenoug has(有一題問此句意義) 有主題題：我選提出了一種新的theoryexplainaphenomena78.關(guān)于canada以前是否有hugehot-blooded舉了很多原因：氣候，氣候?qū)lantbiomass的影響以及其對hot-blooded的predator的影響等(有題，except題型)后面有轉(zhuǎn)折however，

　　【V3：2002】荷馬史詩(伊利亞特、奧的賽): 對于荷馬的兩個作品，有一個人好像是通過結(jié)構(gòu)來分析(有composed一詞)說6世紀(jì)之前怎樣怎樣(有single一詞)，6世紀(jì)之后發(fā)生變化，在6世紀(jì)及其second century開始divergent了，第二段說有另一個家伙，認(rèn)為不應(yīng)該從結(jié)構(gòu)上分析，而是要考慮到他的performance(好像是)和其他一些東西，諸如時間地點(diǎn)等等 .

　　相關(guān)文章

　　While a new surge of critical interest in the ancient Greek poems conventionally ascribed to Homer has taken place in the last twenty years or so, it was nonspecialists rather than professional scholars who studied the poetic aspects of the Iliad and the Odyssey between, roughly, 1935 and 1970. During these years, while such nonacademic intellectuals as Simone Weil and Erich Auerbach were trying to dine the qualities that made these epic accounts of the Trojan War and its aftermath great poetry, the questions that occupied the specialists were directed elsewhere: ?Did the Trojan War really happen?? ?Does the bard preserve Indo-European folk memories?? ?How did the poems get written down?? Something was driving scholars away from the actual works to peripheral issues.

　　Scholars produced books about archaeology, about gift-exchange in ancient societies, about the development of oral poetry, about virtually anything except the Iliad and the Odyssey themselves as unique rlections or distillations of life itself?as, in short, great poetry. The observations of the English poet Alexander Pope seemed as applicable in 1970 as they had been when he wrote them in 1715: according to Pope, the remarks of critics ?are rather Philosophical, Historical, Geographic?or rather anything than Critical and Poetical.?

　　Ironically, the modern manifestation of this ?nonpoetical? emphasis can be traced to the profoundly influential work of Milman Parry, who attempted to demonstrate in detail how the Homeric poems, believed to have been recorded nearly three thousand years ago, were the products of a long and highly developed tradition of oral poetry about the Trojan War. Parry proposed that this tradition built up its diction and its content by a process of constant accumulation and rinement over many generations of storytellers. But after Parry?s death in 1935, his legacy was taken up by scholars who, unlike Parry, forsook intensive analysis of the poetry itself and focused instead on only one element of Parry?s work: the creative limitations and possibilities of oral composition, concerning on fixed elements and inflexibilities, focusing on the things that oral poetry allegedly can and cannot do. The dryness if this kind of study drove many of the more inventive scholars away from the poems into the rapidly developing field of Homer?s archaeological and historical background.

　　Appropriately, Milman Parry?s son Adam was among those scholars responsible for a renewed interest in Homer?s poetry as literary art. Building on his father?s work, the younger Parry argued that the Homeric poems exist both within and against a tradition. The Iliad and the Odyssey were, Adam Parry thought, the beniciaries of an inherited store of diction, scenes, and at the same time highly individual works that surpasses these conventions. Adam Parry helped prepare the ground for the recent Homeric revival by affirming his father?s beli in a strong inherited tradition, but also by emphasizing Homer?s unique contributions within that tradition.

　　1. Which one of the following best states the main idea of the passage?

　　(A) The Homeric poems are most fruitfully studied as records of the time and place in which they were written.

　　(B) The Homeric poems are the products of a highly developed and complicated tradition of oral poetry.

　　(C) The Homeric poems are currently enjoying a resurgence of critical interest after an age of scholarship largely devoted to the poems? nonpoetic elements.

　　(D) The Homeric poems are currently enjoying a resurgence of scholarly interest after am age during which most studies were authored by nonacademic writers.

　　(E) Bore Milman Parry published his pioneering work in the early twentieth century, it was difficult to assign a date or an author to the Homeric poems.

　　2. According to the passage, the work of Simone Weil and Erich Auerbach on Homer was primarily concerned with which one of the following?

　　(A) considerations of why criticism of Homer had moved to peripheral issues

　　(B) analyses of the poetry itself in terms of its literary qualities

　　(C) studies in the history and nature of oral poetry

　　(D) analyses of the already ancient epic tradition inherited by Homer

　　(E) critiques of the highly technical analyses of academic critics

　　3. The passage suggests which one of the following about scholarship on Homer that has appeared since 1970?

　　(A) It has dealt extensively with the Homeric poems as literary art.

　　(B) It is more incisive than the work of the Parrys.

　　(C) It has rejected as irrelevant the scholarship produced by specialists between 1935 and 1970.

　　(D) It has ignored the work of Simone Weil and Erich Auerbach.

　　(E) It has attempted to confirm that the Iliad and the Odyssey were written by Homer.

　　4. The author of the passage most probably quotes Alexander Pope (lines 24-26) in order to

　　(A) indicate that the Homeric poems have generally received poor treatment at the hands of English critics

　　(B) prove that poets as well as critics have emphasized elements peripheral to the poems

　　(C) illustrate that the nonpoetical emphasis also existed in an earlier century

　　(D) emphasize the problems inherent in rendering classical Greek poetry into modern English

　　(E) argue that poets and literary critics have seldom agreed the interpretation of poetry

　　5. According to the passage, which one of the following is true of Milman Parry?s immediate successors in the field of Homeric studies?

　　(A) They reconciled Homer?s poetry with archaeological and historical concerns.

　　(B) They acknowledged the tradition of oral poetry, but focused on the uniqueness of Homer?s poetry within the tradition.

　　(C) They occupied themselves with the question of what qualities made for great poetry.

　　(D) They emphasized the boundaries of oral poetry.

　　(E) They called for a revival of Homer?s popularity.

　　6. Which one of the following best describes the organization of the passage?

　　(A) A situation is identified and its origins are examines.

　　(B) A series of hypotheses is reviewed and one is advocated.

　　(C) The works of two influential scholars are summarized.

　　(D) Several issues contributing to a currently debate are summarized.

　　(E) Three possible solutions to a long-standing problem are posed

　　以上就是對于9月GMAT閱讀機(jī)經(jīng)的相關(guān)介紹，希望對大家備考GMAT考試有所幫助，文中觀點(diǎn)僅供參考。