GMAT作文機經(jīng)整理：足球比賽與經(jīng)濟發(fā)展.

　　GMAT作文機經(jīng)整體來說受換庫影響不是很大，但是還是會有一些新題的，考生朋友可以將最近兩三個月的GMAT作文機經(jīng)都拿出來看看，為此澳際小編特收集整理GMAT作文機經(jīng)分享給大家，希望對大家有所幫助。

　　【考古】11月機經(jīng)

　　V1：一個B城市,5年前hold a soccer competition. 發(fā)現(xiàn)相比在這個competition3年前，在這個competition舉辦后的3年的number of tourists increased 25%。所以呢,這個B城市打算再舉辦一次類似的sport event來吸引游客。這個城市B相信，sport event會增加游客人數(shù)，同時benit the country economy

　　V2：The country of Bonaria held a major soccer event five years ago. Therore, if the country continues to hold major sport events, tourism will increase rapidly in the country and thus bring benits to the country&aposs economy.

　　【參考思路】

　　1. 錯誤的由時間先后推出因果關(guān)系

　　2. 過去的成功不能保證將來，存在他因

　　3. 因果關(guān)系：不能因為一場球賽吸引了很多觀眾就要舉辦更多的比賽。首先舉辦比賽需要場地。足球比賽對場地的要求較低，但如果是舉辦體操，游泳等比賽，會花費大量的建廠成本，也許會超過收入。

　　4. 論據(jù)以偏概全：不能因為一場球賽就說明所有的國際比賽都很吸引觀眾。也許是因為這場比賽的重要性和特殊性導(dǎo)致了其有很高的觀眾參與度，就像Olympic game一樣。但是其他的國際比賽也許不能有這樣的效果。

　　5. Either or 的選擇：提高經(jīng)濟收入并不僅僅有通過舉辦比賽這樣一種方式，還可以發(fā)展當(dāng)?shù)氐穆糜翁厣诰蜃鳛橐粋€island的特點，從而增加收入

　　【參考范文】

　　這篇是網(wǎng)友作文作品，還請大家謹(jǐn)慎參考，不能保證質(zhì)量

　　The conclusion endorsed in the given argument is that tourism will increase rapidly in Bonaria and thus bring benits to Bonaria’s economy if the country continues to hold major sport events. A major reason is offered in support of this argument, the author points out that after the soccer event that was held 5 years ago, the number of tourists to Bonaria has increased by 25% in the last 3 years. At first glance, the author’s argument appears to be plausible, but close scrutiny reveals that the conclusion is based on some dubious assumptions and the reasoning is biased due to the inadequacy and partiality in the nature of evidence provided to justify the conclusion.

　　To begin with，the author is committed a fallacy of “after this, therore, because of this ”. The line of reasoning is that because the major soccer event was held bore the increment of Bonaria’s tourists, the former caused the latter. However, this reasoning is fallacious unless other possible causal factors have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps the increment of tourists is resulted from a newly opened national park of Bonaria

　　, or a substantial reduction of cost to visit Bonaria might be the direct reason. Without thorough analysis of the real cause of the increment of tourist, it would be groundless to attribute it to the soccer event held 5 years ago.

　　Secondly, even if the soccer event indeed caused the increment of tourist in the past 3 years, the author still unfairly infers that the prosperity of tourism will continue to develop by hold more sport events, which might not be soccer event. The author relies on a gratuitous assumption that soccer event is representative of all sport events, in general. Since soccer, the so called “Man’s game”, is the most popular sport all around the world, it’s hasty to say that other sport events can have the same stimulating fect on the tourism of Bonaria. So unless it can be shown that the sport events which Bonaria is planed to hold in the future are also fashionable enough to attract tourists, the conclusion that the tourism will grow rapidly as a result of more held sport events in Bonaria is fairly unwarranted.

　　The last but not least, the author assumes that rapid grow in tourism will thus brings great benits to the country’s economy. As we know, profit is factor of both revenue and cost, this assumption fails to take into account for cost increases and inficiency results from the quickly growing number of tourists. To evaluate the argument, whether the revenue of the newly held sport events can weigh against the sport events’ total cost, which is not only from the construction of new stadiums but also from the sanitation problems, is must be taken into account. The trivial organizations of so much sport events will also increase the cost. In short, this assumption is highly suspect unless it could be supported with a thorough cost-benit analysis.

　　To conclude, this argument is unwarranted as it stands. Accordingly, it is imprudent for the author to claim that the tourism will increase rapidly in the country and thus bring benits to the country’s economy if Bonaria hold more sport events in the future. To make this argument logically acceptable, the author should provide more evidences to demonstrate that 1) The 25% increased proportion of the number of tourists in Bonaria is caused by the major soccer event that held 5 years ago; 2) The planed sport events can attract tourists as fective as soccer do; 3) The revenue of the newly held sport events in the future could weigh against the total cost. Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than a just an wishful thinking.

　　以上就是2月份的GMAT作文機經(jīng)部分，考生朋友可以根據(jù)文中的意思自己選擇性練習(xí)，看自己拿到題目后是否會做，最后祝大家都能考出好成績。