5月6日換庫后,小編現(xiàn)在為大家開始收集整理5月的GMAT作文機(jī)經(jīng),下面這篇是關(guān)于大學(xué),社區(qū),私人,醫(yī)院一篇GMAT作文機(jī)經(jīng),分享給大家,希望對大家有所幫助,文中觀點(diǎn)僅供參考。
【原始v1】坐穩(wěn)是關(guān)于大學(xué)醫(yī)院不如社區(qū)和私人醫(yī)院那篇
【原始v2】大學(xué)醫(yī)院和other kinds of hospitals. 題目中寫university hospitals in our region have fewer doctors, less successful rate to treat patients.而且學(xué)校醫(yī)院的devide their time among teaching, conduct rexsearch,and treating patients.所以很Clearly university hospitals不如其他kinds of hospitals。
【考古】The following appeared in an article in the health section of a newspaper.
“There is a common misconception that university hospitals are better than community or private hospitals. This notion is unfounded, however: the university hospitals in our region employ 15 percent fewer doctors, have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients, make far less overall profit, and pay their medical staff considerably less than do private hospitals. Furthermore, many doctors at university hospitals typically divide their time among teaching, conducting research, and treating patients. From this it seems clear that the quality of care at university hospitals is lower than that at other kinds of hospitals.”
【參考思路】
1 15percent doctors,一家醫(yī)院就占這么多,人數(shù)不一定算少。人數(shù)多少和醫(yī)院水平?jīng)]有必然聯(lián)系。
2 20percent lower也許都是疑難雜癥,其他醫(yī)院都治不了。
3 少的利潤可能是因?yàn)閮r(jià)格親民(醫(yī)生薪水低)
4 在research和teaching過程中能產(chǎn)生新技術(shù),更好的treating
【范文】
In this argument the author concludes that university hospitals provide no better care than private or community hospitals. The author bases this conclusion on the following claims about university hospitals: the ones in this region employ 15 percent fewer doctors; they have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients; they pay their staffs less money; they make less profit than community hospitals; and they utilize doctors who divide their time between teaching, research and treating patients. This argument is unconvincing for several reasons.
The most egregious reasoning error in the argument is the author’s use of evidence pertaining to university hospitals in this region as the basis for a generalization about all university hospitals. The underlying assumption operative in this inference is that university hospitals in this region are representative of all university hospitals. No evidence is offered to support this gratuitous assumption.
Secondly, the only relevant reason offered in support of the claim that the quality of care is lower in university hospitals than it is at other hospitals is the fact that university hospitals have a lower success rate in treating patients. But this reason is not sufficient to reach the conclusion in question unless it can be shown that the patients treated in both types of hospitals suffered from similar types of maladies. For example, if university hospitals routinely treat patients suffering from rare diseases whereas other hospitals treat only those who suffer from known diseases and illnesses, the difference in success rates would not be indicative of the quality of care received.
Finally, the author assumes that the number of doctors a hospital employs, its success rate in treating patients, the amount it pays its staff, and the profits it earns are all reliable indicators of the quality of care it delivers. No evidence is offered to support this assumption nor is it obvious that any of these factors is linked to the quality of care delivered to patients. Moreover, the fact that doctors in university hospitals divide their time among many tasks fails to demonstrate that they do a poorer job of treating patients than doctors at other kinds of hospitals. In fact, it is highly likely that they do a better job because they are more knowledgeable than other doctors due to their teaching and research.
In conclusion, the author’s argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to demonstrate that university hospitals in this region are representative of all university hospitals, as well as establishing a causal link between the various factors cited and the quality of care delivered to patients.
以上就是關(guān)于大學(xué),社區(qū),私人,醫(yī)院的GMAT作文機(jī)經(jīng)的全部內(nèi)容,分享給大家,希望對大家有所幫助,最后祝大家都能考出好成績。
Amy GUO 經(jīng)驗(yàn): 17年 案例:4539 擅長:美國,澳洲,亞洲,歐洲
本網(wǎng)站(goplaceswithdan.com,刊載的所有內(nèi)容,訪問者可將本網(wǎng)站提供的內(nèi)容或服務(wù)用于個(gè)人學(xué)習(xí)、研究或欣賞,以及其他非商業(yè)性或非盈利性用途,但同時(shí)應(yīng)遵守著作權(quán)法及其他相關(guān)法律規(guī)定,不得侵犯本網(wǎng)站及相關(guān)權(quán)利人的合法權(quán)利。除此以外,將本網(wǎng)站任何內(nèi)容或服務(wù)用于其他用途時(shí),須征得本網(wǎng)站及相關(guān)權(quán)利人的書面許可,并支付報(bào)酬。
本網(wǎng)站內(nèi)容原作者如不愿意在本網(wǎng)站刊登內(nèi)容,請及時(shí)通知本站,予以刪除。
1、拔打奧際教育全國咨詢熱線: 400--601--0022 (8:00-24:00)。
2、點(diǎn)擊 【在線咨詢】,我們會有咨詢老師為您提供專業(yè)的疑難問題解答。
3、 【在線預(yù)約】咨詢,填寫表單信息,隨后我們會安排咨詢老師回訪。