關(guān)閉

澳際學(xué)費(fèi)在線支付平臺(tái)

4月份GMAT作文機(jī)經(jīng):Oak city’s new shopping mall.

2017/08/10 14:41:43 編輯: 瀏覽次數(shù):225 移動(dòng)端

  4月5日GMAT換庫后,小編為大家收集整理4月份的GMAT作文機(jī)經(jīng),這篇是關(guān)于Oak city’s new shopping mall的文章,分享給大家,希望對(duì)大家有所幫助,僅供參考。

  【原始】

  作文 是講一個(gè)shopping mall 作者說 去年在OKA(第一個(gè)地方)開shopping mall

  是一個(gè)錯(cuò)誤 好像是什么犯罪率高了什么的 問第二個(gè)地方什么的 作文寫的不好

  不太記得了

  【考古】11月JJ39

  The following editorial appeared in the Elm City paper.

  “The construction last year of a shopping mall in downtown Oak City was a mistake. Since the mall has opened, a number of local businesses have closed, and the downtown area suffers from an acute parking shortage, and arrests for crime and vagrancy have increased in the nearby Oak City Park. Elm City should pay attention to the example of the Oak City mall and deny the application to build a shopping mall in Elm City.”

  【參考思路】

  1、Gratuitous Assumption——無根據(jù)結(jié)論: A 不導(dǎo)致B

  1商場的建立不一定導(dǎo)致local businesses關(guān)門:shopping mall吸引人氣,商場附近會(huì)有更多人流,潛在顧客會(huì)增多,反而可能使當(dāng)?shù)氐纳虡I(yè)繁榮

  2商場的建立不一定導(dǎo)致停車場不足:長期來看,shopping mall會(huì)使當(dāng)?shù)囟愂赵黾?,政府有更多的錢用來修路和停車場,停車問題會(huì)改善

  3商場的建立也不一定導(dǎo)致犯罪和流浪漢增多,商場的建立會(huì)增加就業(yè)機(jī)會(huì),窮人有了穩(wěn)定的工作就不會(huì)去犯罪或者流浪,長期看會(huì)減少犯罪和流浪者

  2、有他因

  1local商業(yè)關(guān)門可能是其他原因造成的,如政府稅收太高,當(dāng)?shù)厣倘思娂娺x擇移民

  2停車場不足可能是其他的因素造成,比如正值非洲66國元首集體訪問oka市,市政府采取單雙號(hào)限行,造成車位緊張

  3犯罪和流浪者增多可能是其他因素造成的,比如房價(jià)太高,大學(xué)生畢業(yè)找不到工作,只好選擇犯罪或者流浪

  1、 False analogy:(Oak city 和Elm city 不能做類比,因?yàn)檫@兩座城市的經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況,基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施和生活水平都是不同的。)

  2、可疑調(diào)查survey is doubtful(以上提到的幾項(xiàng)調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)全部來源不明,可能不夠中立客觀)

  【參考范文】

  此范文與該題略有出入,是老版本的題目,請(qǐng)大家在考場上小心:

  老題題干:

  “The construction of last year of a shopping mall in downtown Oak City has done little for the residents of the community. Since the mall has opened, a number of local businesses have closed, and the downtown area suffers from an acute parking shortage. In addition, because the mall’s owner lives in nearby Elm City, the profits derived from sales at the mall are not being returned to the community. These problems, coupled with the increase in trash and litter in nearby Oak City park, demonstrate that Oak City did not use good judgment in allowing the construction of the mall in the first place.”

  In this editorial the author rebukes Oak City for allowing the construction of a new downtown shopping mall. Citing a number of problems that have occurred since the building of the mail, the author concludes that the residents of Oak City have not benited from the mail and that Oak City exercised poor judgment in allowing the mail to be built. Among the problems cited by the author are the closure of local businesses, lack of parking in the downtown area, and increased trash and litter in a city park near the mall. Moreover, the author argues that profits derived from sales are not beniting Oak City because the owner of the mall lives in another city. The author’s argument is problematic in several respects.

  In the first place, the author assumes that addition of the new mall is the cause of the various problems cited. The only evidence offered to support this claim is that the construction of the mall occurred bore these problems manifested themselves. However, this evidence is insufficient to establish the claim in question. A chronological relationship is only one of the indicators of a causal relationship between two events.

  In the second place, the author has focused only on negative fects the mall has had on the city. A more detailed analysis of the situation might reveal that the positive benits for the city far outweigh the problems on which the author focuses. For example, new jobs might have been created for the residents of Oak City, and tax revenues might have been increased for the city. Lacking a more comprehensive analysis of the impact of the mail on Oak City, it is presumptuous on the part of the author to conclude that Oak City’s decision to allow the mall to be built was incorrect.

  In conclusion, the author’s argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to demonstrate that the construction of the mall caused the various problems mentioned. The author would also have to show that the negative fects of the project outweighed the positive fects.

  以上就是關(guān)于Oak city’s new shopping mall的GMAT作文機(jī)經(jīng)的全部內(nèi)容,考生朋友可以有選擇的看看,最后需要提醒各位的是,機(jī)經(jīng)雖然會(huì)對(duì)我們解題有所幫助,但是在考場中即使題目很像也要避免秒選,最后祝大家都能考出好成績。

  • 澳際QQ群:610247479
  • 澳際QQ群:445186879
  • 澳際QQ群:414525537