GMAT考試作文機(jī)經(jīng)AA部分 5月8日更新（十二）.

GMAT考試已于2012年5月4日更換題庫，以下是2012年5月的GMAT作文AA部分機(jī)經(jīng)更新，更新日期從12年5月4日開始，澳際留學(xué)小編會(huì)為您送上最新的機(jī)經(jīng)的，希望大家多多關(guān)注本頻道。在此澳際留學(xué)祝大家GMAT考試順利!有一種夢(mèng)想叫做，常青藤；有一種力量，叫做榜樣。你們準(zhǔn)備好了嗎？現(xiàn)在開始免費(fèi)領(lǐng)取澳際圖書《飛越常青藤》啦！和他們一起飛躍常青藤！

　　19.(2次)

　　原始寂靜：

　　V1(BY: cherie_w ): 建議大家買房子，說是買房子好時(shí)機(jī)。因?yàn)檫^去5年房子都漲價(jià)了。而股票降價(jià)了。而且買房子能享受房子，不像股票，沒對(duì)生活做什么貢獻(xiàn)。

　　V2(BY: Dflying) 一個(gè)研究報(bào)告說一個(gè)地方房價(jià)在過去5年升值了很多，遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超出了股票升值的價(jià)值，如果你投資房子 就能在實(shí)用房子的同時(shí)享受它的升值，所以建議政府去投資。

　　考古：

　　Now is the perfect time to buy a house in our city. Over the past five years, average home prices in our region have nearly doubled. But average stock prices in the national stock market have actually declined over the same period. So homeowners have seen an increase in value for their housing investment during the last five years that far exceeds what they could have made by investing in the stock market. Our city’s residents can surely achieve a similar profit over the next five years. Furthermore, if residents invest in a home, they can enjoy the use of the home while its value increase, whereas money invested in stocks would not contribute to their quality of life in the same way that owning a home would. Therore, all the residents of our city should invest their money in a home.

　　七宗罪思路：

　　l 數(shù)據(jù)有效性：只是5年的時(shí)間，從長遠(yuǎn)來看，不一定誰漲得厲害。

　　l 差異概念：房子的增值和股票增值的概念不同。房子增值你不能變現(xiàn)，因?yàn)樽儸F(xiàn)了，你還是需要再買(高價(jià))。而股票可以立即變現(xiàn)。即VALUE和PROFIT不是一個(gè)概念。

　　l 錯(cuò)誤類比：股票的投資可以不定額的投資(可小可大)，可是房子的投資需要很大一筆。并不是每個(gè)人都適合投資房產(chǎn)。

　　l 錯(cuò)誤假設(shè)：文中假設(shè)大家都不會(huì)搬遷，都會(huì)一直住在這個(gè)城市。而一旦如果這個(gè)城市流動(dòng)性很大，則投資房產(chǎn)為提高生活質(zhì)量顯然不成立。

　　EITHER OR: 即使資金足夠的情況下，也不一定就不能投股票而應(yīng)投房產(chǎn)。因從投資的角度來看，應(yīng)該分散風(fēng)險(xiǎn)(DIVERSIFY)。所以大可又投股票又投房產(chǎn)

　　參考范文：非常感謝chingchan123!~

　　我看了那篇買房子還是買股票的那篇沒有例文，我很快寫了一篇， 大家參考下多給個(gè)意見。

　　While the stock price is declining, the house price has been soaring over the last 5 years. According to the author, it is the high time we buy the house rather than invest in the stock market. To further substantiate his advice, the author also points out that a house can help generate a life of higher quality than a stock does. Unfortunately, the reasoning behind the suggestion suffers from several critical problems.

　　In the first place, the argument is based on a unfounded assumption that owning a stock can not contribute to a high-level life quality as owning a home can. Even if, as the author says, a home can in some way contribute to a happier and better life for someone, there are possibilities that investing money in the stock market can be a better lifestyle for others. Perhaps, the ups-and-down experience or the pay-first experiences are the understanding of better life for those people. Not all men love peacul and even bland life. Without considering the general conception of better life, the author can hardly convince us of the suggestion based on the problematic assumption.

　　Furthermore, the argument is ill-founded due to the lack of enough samples to support his opinion. The author suggests the house purchase simply because the house prices during the last 5 years have nearly doubled whereas the stock prices have fallen. The only evidence used is the statistic from the past five years, a statistic not necessarily acting as a good indicator of the general trend. It might be the case that a policy which supported the property market was introduced five years ago, but it will not be fect from the end of this year. If it were the case, the evidence cited by the author is an atypical and exceptional one. Unless providing enough information to prove that the statistic from the past 5 years is representative of the following several years, the suggestion is unwarranted and fallacious.

　　To better back up the suggestion, the author should clearly point out the general understanding of high-quality life, and try to indicate that the price trend for both property and stock market would continue.

　　20.(2次)

　　原始寂靜：

　　V1(BY: bradenny): One company is doing business in mining technology, but recently the profit drops. So there is someone suggesting for company to look at renewable enery, such as solar, wind, etc, which is exciting and new. They believe it will bring the company profits and keep the stock prices.

　　考古：

　　V1一個(gè)Blastom公司，以前是mining technology，由于mining technology的市場(chǎng)變小，為保證股價(jià)和利潤，B公司有新戰(zhàn)略：讓以前研究mining的科學(xué)家研究renewable energy，一些公司已經(jīng)在新能源領(lǐng)域做得很成功啦，所以B公司轉(zhuǎn)向新能源領(lǐng)域能保證股價(jià)和利潤

　　V2好像是“能源產(chǎn)品的價(jià)格和股票走低，使得一些公司不能盈利，include B company.然而有一些2company非常好。B company決定一個(gè)策略：將自己公司的researcher去轉(zhuǎn)向新能源，比如風(fēng)能，太陽能。這樣就可以一直保持盈利

　　V3說專攻mining 技術(shù)的一個(gè)M公司開始把他們家的專家staff轉(zhuǎn)向研究新能源例如天然氣之類的。因?yàn)榻^大多數(shù)的新能源公司在過去幾年都很成功。所以這個(gè)M公司覺著他們也能保證盈利

　　V4 Due to woldwide derease in demand for mining technology, 某公司profit and stock prices went down. 但是有一些prominent companies in renewable technologies發(fā)展的很好。因此該公司應(yīng)該把research的力量全部投入到renewable technologies去，這樣就能stay safe from any future decline.

　　V5去年礦產(chǎn)業(yè)效益不好，利潤下降，一個(gè)技術(shù)公司為了 扭轉(zhuǎn)局面，放棄研究礦產(chǎn)技術(shù)開發(fā)轉(zhuǎn)而投資研究新能源開發(fā) 比如太陽能 風(fēng)能還有生物能源，取得了良好的效益。 根據(jù)這件事寫個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)之類的東西，讓你討論在什么情況下，是weaken這個(gè)結(jié)論的。

　　七宗罪思路：

　　1. all things are equal: 新能源在過去成功不代表將來也成功

　　2.因果關(guān)系：未考慮競(jìng)爭(zhēng)可能異常激烈，市場(chǎng)飽和

　　3.錯(cuò)誤假設(shè)：假設(shè)轉(zhuǎn)為新能源就一定能盈利

相關(guān)鏈接：

1.GMAT考試作文機(jī)經(jīng)AA部分 5月8日更新（十三）

2.GMAT考試作文機(jī)經(jīng)AI部分 5月7日更新（九）

3.怎樣寫好GMAT作文的開頭